Re: possible bug in getmntent (3) manpage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lucien,

On 6/27/22 14:32, Lucien Gentis wrote:
Distribution: Debian 11 Bullseye

Hello,

In getmntent_r function description:

Shouldn't it be:

"but stores the mntent struct in the provided *mntbuf"

Yes, you fix makes sense.


instead of:

"but stores the struct mount in the provided *mntbuf"

(I don't understand what "the struct mount" refers to)

I guess the writer of the page had the word mount in mind, since 'mntent' is short for mount entry, and accidentally wrote that.

I used a wording slightly different to the one you propose, to be consistent with the style present in many pages where we say things like 'mntent structure' instead of 'struct mntent' or 'mntent struct'. See the patch I applied below.

Cheers,

Alex


    getmntent.3: wfix

    Reported-by: Lucien Gentis <lucien.gentis@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/man3/getmntent.3 b/man3/getmntent.3
index b327d228b..84c9d1b96 100644
--- a/man3/getmntent.3
+++ b/man3/getmntent.3
@@ -126,10 +126,11 @@ The reentrant
 function is similar to
 .BR getmntent (),
 but stores the
-.I struct mount
+.I mntent
+structure
 in the provided
-.I *mntbuf
-and stores the strings pointed to by the entries in that struct
+.IR *mntbuf ,
+and stores the strings pointed to by the entries in that structure
 in the provided array
 .I buf
 of size

--
Alejandro Colomar
<http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux