Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] userfaultfd.2: Update to latest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>, 2022-06-06, 16:33:
At 2022-06-06T15:40:08-0400, Peter Xu wrote:
I think the patch below would improve a little bit the wording (and newlines). I still have a bit of trouble understanding "When a kernel-originated fault was triggered on the registered range with this userfaultfd". Did you maybe mean "range registered" instead of "registered range"?

Since I'm not a native speaker I don't immediately see the difference between the two.

Short answer: I think your existing wording is acceptable.

I think you missed the context. You get a different parse tree when you swap the words:

  ...triggered (on the registered range) (with this userfaultfd).

vs

  ...triggered (on the range (registered with this userfaultfd)).

--
Jakub Wilk



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux