Re: [RFC PATCH] getvalues(2) prototype

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 06:19:51PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'm still a bit puzzled about the reason for getvalues(2) beyond,
> "reduce the number of system calls".  Is this a performance argument?
> If so, have you benchmarked lsof using this new interface?

Yeah.  Even if open + read + close is a bnottle neck for fuse or
network file systems I think a io_uring op for just that is a much
better choice instead of this crazy multi-value operation.

And even on that I need to be sold first.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux