Re: [PATCH] mmap.2: ENOMEM possible when exceeding VA space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jakub,

On 11/22/21 17:15, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@xxxxxxxxx>, 2021-11-11, 20:04:
+.B ENOMEM
+We don't like
+.IR addr ,
+because it exceeds the virtual address space of the CPU.
+.TP

Who is "we"?

I was going to ask the same, but that page already describes other errors like that. If only for consistency, and avoiding a complete rewrite of that ERRORS section, I applied the patch as is.

But yes, "we" doesn't sound like very technical.  Maybe we should fix this.


FWIW, failing with ENOMEM in this case may seem weird, but this is what POSIX prescribes.


Thanks,
Alex


--
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux