Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] timegm.3: Remove recommendation against use of timegm()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paul,

On 10/11/21 5:40 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 10/11/21 4:12 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:

time_t portable_timegm(struct tm *tm)
{
    tm->tm_isdst = 0;
    /*
     * If another thread modifies the timezone during the
     * execution of the line below, it will produce undefined
     * behavior.
     */
    return mktime(tm) - timezone;
}

This doesn't work for multiple reasons:


it's not thread-safe,

Actually, since timegm(3) is implemented in terms of mktime(3), as far as I could read from glibc code, the problem will be the same, I think. I don't understand why it wasn't the other way around; maybe it was more complex internally... But timegm(3) shouldn't need to depend on environment variables.

mktime might set timezone even in a single-threaded app,

Yes, I should have called tzset() before the return line.

and the subtraction might overflow.

Yup, casting to int64_t needed. BTW, I had a look at mktime source code, and it uses long, which might be 32 bits, and then there's a lot of checking for overflow. Wouldn't it be simpler to just implement mktime(3) with int64_t internally? Then, only at the return, cast it implicitly to whatever time_t means, but int64_t would simplify the code very much, I think.

Thanks,

Alex

--
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux