Re: Rename VERBATIM license (was: Re: [RFC v3 8/9] Many pages: [Verbatim-man-pages] Use SPDX markings)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Alex!

At 2021-09-08T10:22:09+0200, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> On 9/8/21 6:35 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I'd like to request a different choice of name for the SPDX license
> > tag used by the man-pages documents affected by this change.
> Completely agree!
[...]
> > Any of the above could be further prefixed with "Linux-" to
> > reinforce the specificity to this project, of course.  If pressed
> > for a preference, I reckon I would pick "Linux-man-pages-copyleft".
> 
> I like that name.  Less historical, but more precise.  Michael?
> 
> Acked-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> The identifier "Verbatim-man-pages" is already in SPDX, but it is yet
> unreleased.  They talked about releasing soon, so could you please
> jump in there and propose that change to SPDX?:
> <https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1310#issuecomment-911876593>

I've submitted a PR to this project[1].

> BTW, does the "traditional GNU documentation license" have an SPDX
> identifier?

It appears to be present in SPDX as the "Latex2e" license[2].  LaTeX has
a long history, so it's quite possible that it is the true origin of
what I have called the "traditional GNU documentation license" for many
years.

This is a point worth researching; thanks for prompting me.

> > I feel that the "VERBATIM" string is similarly misleading, but it's
> > not presented as an SPDX license tag, and I see that its use is
> > already well-entrenched.  I expected to find something like a sed
> > script in the man-pages scripts/ directory that manipulated lines
> > matching '%%%LICENSE_START(' but failed to.  Perhaps a convenient
> > new moniker could be adopted to supersede "VERBATIM" in this
> > context, once the SPDX tagging initiative is complete?
> 
> The SPDX license text doesn't contain the LICENSE_START and
> LICENSE_END lines, so if we change the name, there will be no traces
> of VERBATIM (apart from the git history, that is).

Sounds nice and clean!

Regards,
Branden

[1] https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/issues/1310
[2] https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/blob/master/src/Latex2e.xml

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux