On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 04:56:21PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: > I'm a bit worried that this might be overcomplicating it, and maybe a > hypothetical .SSS macro would be useful here (or another solution). Do you > have any thoughts about it? > > That hypothetical macro would behave like .TP + .B + .RS (as shown above; > and that .RS would only end at a following .SSS/.SS/.SH) It is not important to me that my .SSS macro be used, but for reference here it is: .de1 SSS . if !r SSS_SN_ORIG .nr SSS_SN_ORIG \\n[SN] . nr SN (2 * \\n[SSS_SN_ORIG]) . SS \&\\$* . nr SN (\\n[SSS_SN_ORIG]) ..
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
