On 8/27/21 4:07 PM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
Could you break this patch into a few of them?
I could if I had more time, but I'd rather not. If you have the time to break up the patch please feel free. My suggestion, however, is for us to work on the patch together until it passes muster; that should be more efficient for both you and me.
Also, for the removal of malloc(0), is it that glibc removed that behavior?
In glibc, malloc(0) always returns a unique nonnull pointer when it succeeds. This behavior conforms to POSIX but is not required by POSIX, as POSIX also allows malloc(0) to return NULL when it succeeds.
This has been glibc behavior for decades. The patch merely documents the behavior more clearly. (It also documents some other behavior that *has* changed recently.)
I think that info should go in the commit message
OK, revised patch attached. It's the same as before, except for the commit message.
From be9fc3024c23c8fdb2d8fe96a384a223e3829207 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 14:56:41 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] malloc.3: modernize for glibc 2.34 glibc has tightened up its rules for replacing the memory allocator. I went through the malloc man page and looked for how it documented malloc and related functions, and fixed discrepancies with glibc malloc documentation and/or implementation. In particular, I documented the behavior for size-zero allocations: malloc (0) returns nonnull on success in glibc (POSIX allows it to return null), realloc (0, N) behaves like malloc (N), and realloc (P, 0) where P is nonnull frees P and returns NULL (POSIX and the C standard allow other behaviors for these cases, and this patch documents that too). I also reorganized the portability discussion so that portability issues can be seen more clearly. --- man3/malloc.3 | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) diff --git a/man3/malloc.3 b/man3/malloc.3 index 0214233bb..fe88948d1 100644 --- a/man3/malloc.3 +++ b/man3/malloc.3 @@ -68,23 +68,20 @@ If .I size is 0, then .BR malloc () -returns either NULL, -.\" glibc does this: -or a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to +returns a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to .BR free (). +(See "Nonportable behavior" for portability issues.) .PP The .BR free () function frees the memory space pointed to by .IR ptr , which must have been returned by a previous call to -.BR malloc (), -.BR calloc (), -or -.BR realloc (). +.BR malloc () +or related functions. Otherwise, or if -.I free(ptr) -has already been called before, undefined behavior occurs. +.I ptr +has already been freed, undefined behavior occurs. If .I ptr is NULL, no operation is performed. @@ -103,9 +100,7 @@ or .I size is 0, then .BR calloc () -returns either NULL, -.\" glibc does this: -or a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to +returns a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to .BR free (). If the multiplication of .I nmemb @@ -150,14 +145,12 @@ and .I ptr is not NULL, then the call is equivalent to .I free(ptr) -(this behavior is nonportable; see NOTES). +(but see "Nonportable behavior" for portability issues). Unless .I ptr is NULL, it must have been returned by an earlier call to -.BR malloc (), -.BR calloc (), -or -.BR realloc (). +.B malloc +or related functions. If the area pointed to was moved, a .I free(ptr) is done. @@ -184,60 +177,46 @@ call, fails safely in the case where the multiplication would overflow. If such an overflow occurs, .BR reallocarray () -returns NULL, sets -.I errno -to -.BR ENOMEM , -and leaves the original block of memory unchanged. +returns an error. .SH RETURN VALUE The -.BR malloc () +.BR malloc (), +.BR calloc (), +.BR realloc (), and -.BR calloc () +.BR reallocarray () functions return a pointer to the allocated memory, -which is suitably aligned for any built-in type. -On error, these functions return NULL. -NULL may also be returned by a successful call to -.BR malloc () -with a -.I size -of zero, -or by a successful call to -.BR calloc () -with -.I nmemb -or -.I size -equal to zero. +which is suitably aligned for any type that fits into +the requested size or less. +On error, these functions return NULL and set +.IR errno . +Attempting to allocate more than +.B PTRDIFF_MAX +bytes is considered an error, as an object that large +could cause later pointer subtraction to overflow. .PP The .BR free () -function returns no value. +function returns no value, and preserves +.IR errno . .PP The .BR realloc () -function returns a pointer to the newly allocated memory, which is suitably -aligned for any built-in type, or NULL if the request failed. -The returned pointer may be the same as +and +.BR reallocarray () +functions return NULL if +.I ptr +is not NULL and the requested size is zero; +this is not considered an error. +(See "Nonportable behavior" for portability issues.) +Otherwise, the returned pointer may be the same as .IR ptr if the allocation was not moved (e.g., there was room to expand the allocation in-place), or different from .IR ptr if the allocation was moved to a new address. -If -.I size -was equal to 0, either NULL or a pointer suitable to be passed to -.BR free () -is returned. -If -.BR realloc () -fails, the original block is left untouched; it is not freed or moved. -.PP -On success, the -.BR reallocarray () -function returns a pointer to the newly allocated memory. -On failure, -it returns NULL and the original block of memory is left untouched. +If these functions fail, +the original block is left untouched; it is not freed or moved. .SH ERRORS .BR calloc (), .BR malloc (), @@ -257,6 +236,16 @@ limit described in .SH VERSIONS .BR reallocarray () first appeared in glibc in version 2.26. +.PP +.BR malloc () +and related functions rejected sizes greater than +.B PTRDIFF_MAX +starting in glibc 2.30. +.PP +.BR free () +preserved +.I errno +starting in glibc 2.33. .SH ATTRIBUTES For an explanation of the terms used in this section, see .BR attributes (7). @@ -344,30 +333,27 @@ or .BR mmap (2)), and managed with its own mutexes. .PP -SUSv2 requires +If your program uses a private memory allocator, +it should do so by replacing .BR malloc (), +.BR free (), .BR calloc (), and -.BR realloc () -to set +.BR realloc (). +The replacement functions must implement the documented glibc behaviors, +including .I errno -to -.B ENOMEM -upon failure. -Glibc assumes that this is done -(and the glibc versions of these routines do this); if you -use a private malloc implementation that does not set -.IR errno , -then certain library routines may fail without having -a reason in +handling, size-zero allocations, and overflow checking; +otherwise, other library routines may crash or operate incorrectly. +For example, if the replacement +.IR free () +does not preserve errno, then seemingly unrelated library routines may +fail without having a valid reason in .IR errno . +Private memory allocators may also need to replace other glibc functions; +see "Replacing malloc" in the glibc manual for details. .PP -Crashes in -.BR malloc (), -.BR calloc (), -.BR realloc (), -or -.BR free () +Crashes in memory allocators are almost always related to heap corruption, such as overflowing an allocated chunk or freeing the same pointer twice. .PP @@ -378,19 +364,28 @@ implementation is tunable via environment variables; see for details. .SS Nonportable behavior The behavior of -.BR realloc () -when -.I size -is equal to zero, -and -.I ptr -is not NULL, +these functions when the requested size is zero is glibc specific; -other implementations may return NULL, and set -.IR errno . -Portable POSIX programs should avoid it. +other implementations may return NULL without setting +.IR errno , +and portable POSIX programs should tolerate such behavior. See .BR realloc (3p). +.PP +POSIX requires memory allocators +to set +.I errno +upon failure. +However, the C standard does not require this, and applications +portable to non-POSIX platforms should not assume this. +.PP +Portable programs should not use private memory allocators, +as POSIX and the C standard do not allow replacement of +.BR malloc (), +.BR free (), +.BR calloc (), +and +.BR realloc (). .SH SEE ALSO .\" http://g.oswego.edu/dl/html/malloc.html .\" A Memory Allocator - by Doug Lea -- 2.31.1
