Hi Tycho, On 7/28/21 8:16 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > I didn't know about this syscall until just now somehow, but it seems > reasonable to mention it in the fsync. > > Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza> > --- > man2/fsync.2 | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/man2/fsync.2 b/man2/fsync.2 > index 0f070ed2c..32238dc07 100644 > --- a/man2/fsync.2 > +++ b/man2/fsync.2 > @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ to guarantee safe operation. > .BR pwritev (2), > .BR sync (2), > .BR sync_file_range (2), > +.BR syncfs (2), > .BR fflush (3), > .BR fileno (3), > .BR hdparm (8), > > base-commit: fbe71b1b79e72be3b9afc44b5d479e7fd84b598a I'm hesitant about this. syncfs(2) is documented in the sync(2) page, which is already in SEE ALSO. Knowing that, do you still think this patch has benefit? Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/