Re: [PATCH 01/23] pipe.7: also mention writev(2) in atomicity section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/8/21 3:20 PM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On 8/8/21 10:41 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> From: наб <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> writev(2) notes that buffers don't interleave with other process'
>> (a reasonable question to ask), but points to pipe(7) for an exception.
>> pipe(7) did /not/ mention "writev", "iov", "scat", or "gath", which are,
>> in order, reasonable search terms: this was confusing at best and
>> alarming at worst
>>
>> By mentioning writev(2) in the heading, we clearly note that this sort
>> of interleaving behaviour matches write(2)'s and isn't a concern
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahelenia Ziemiańska <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Oops, drop this one that I already sent in the previous set.

Dropped.

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux