On 7/30/21 3:25 AM, Viet Than wrote: >> "[R]eaches at" is not standard English. More idiomatic would be >> "reaches or exceeds". > > Thanks Branden. Searching around on Google, you're right. Usage of > "reaches at or beyond" is way less (1,240 results on Google) than > "reaches or exceeds" (376,000 results). I've modified the patch > accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Viet Than <thanhoangviet@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Viet Than. Patch Applied. Cheers, Michael > > --- > man2/time.2 | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man2/time.2 b/man2/time.2 > index 059222dcd..ab3d3ecba 100644 > --- a/man2/time.2 > +++ b/man2/time.2 > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ specified as NULL cannot fail with the error > .BR EOVERFLOW , > even on ABIs where > .I time_t > -is a signed 32-bit integer and the clock ticks past the time 2**31 > +is a signed 32-bit integer and the clock reaches or exceeds 2**31 seconds > (2038-01-19 03:14:08 UTC, ignoring leap seconds). > (POSIX.1 permits, but does not require, the > .B EOVERFLOW > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
