On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 8:51 PM Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Could you please provide some background on the patch? > Maybe add it to the commit message. > I'd like to be able to review it :) If I recall correctly, it has been conceived as part of effort to debug [1], as it wasn't clear (to me) at the time, why the error occurs; it turned out that the BPF memory, while checked against per-process RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, accounted on per-user basis. I decided to go on and find and document all the places the locked memory is accounted and checked against the limit. > Is the other patch (v2) you sent recently meant to replace this one, > or to complement it? The other patch is an independent one, so it complements it. > Also, please see some comments below. Thank you, I'll update the patch and send v2. [1] https://github.com/strace/strace/issues/74 -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org}
