https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213013 --- Comment #5 from Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) (alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx) --- Hi James, Sorry for the delay! (In reply to James Hunt from comment #4) > Thanks again for reviewing. I've updated the patch but I still think it > needs to be "spelt out" that two plus symbols may be required since that > avoids any confusion. Okay. > Also, I'm afraid I'm using a webmailer so submitting patches to a mailing > list is going to be painful for me, whereas this bugzilla is quick and easy > (and doesn't require me to register, BTW, you don't need to subscribe to <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> to post there :-) But, I understand the rest. > format mails in particular ways, plus > of course to manage a ton more emails ;) But if the real action is happening > on the ML, I wonder if in the future it might be possible to forward all > bugzilla activity automatically to the ML rather than _vice versa_? Yes. After you said these, I remembered that I asked about that some time ago. The ML was subscribed again to this bugzilla activity :) Now the review: Could you please use '.IR ...' instead of '\fI...\fP...'? See this extract from man-manpages(7): [[ The preferred way to write this in the source file is: .BR fcntl () (Using this format, rather than the use of "\fB...\fP()" makes it easier to write tools that parse man page source files.) ]] > Thanks again for your help. Thank you! Alex -- You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.
