Re: [PATCH] sigalstack.2: Mention the need for separate signal stacks for threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[CC += mtk]

Hi Florian,

On 5/18/21 10:40 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Signed-off-by: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>


I don't understand how this works, so I'll CC Michael so that he merges it.

Thanks,

Alex

---
  man2/sigaltstack.2 | 7 +++++--
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/man2/sigaltstack.2 b/man2/sigaltstack.2
index 53268ccbe..1510a98ab 100644
--- a/man2/sigaltstack.2
+++ b/man2/sigaltstack.2
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ alternate signal stack.
  An alternate signal stack is used during the
  execution of a signal handler if the establishment of that handler (see
  .BR sigaction (2))
-requested it.
+requested it using the
+.B SA_ONSTACK
+flag.  Each thread that can execute such signal handlers needs its own
+separate alternate signal stack.
  .PP
  The normal sequence of events for using an alternate signal stack
  is the following:
@@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ signal stack.
  Use
  .BR sigaltstack ()
  to inform the system of the existence and
-location of the alternate signal stack.
+location of the alternate signal stack for the current thread.
  .TP
  3.
  When establishing a signal handler using



--
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Senior SW Engineer; http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux