Re: [PATCH v5] sgx.7: New page with overview of Software Guard eXtensions (SGX)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 5/10/21 7:52 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +This can lead to reserving a large region than required by the payload,
> +but the address space can be obviously trimmed after the enclave has been
> +constructed on,
> +with a sequence of
> +.BR mmap(MAP_FIXED)
> +calls.

Sorry if I missed this previously.

But, do we really intend to suggest the use of mmap(MAP_FIXED) for this?
 What's the harm in leaving a non-populated piece of address space of
mmap()'d /dev/sgx_enclave?



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux