Re: [PATCH v5 34/35] ioctl_fslabel.2: Make clear why exactly is each header needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Alex,

On 4/4/21 1:58 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> Only the include that provides the prototype doesn't need a comment.
> 
> Also sort the includes alphabetically.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>


Patch applied.

Thanks,

Michael


> ---
>  man2/ioctl_fslabel.2 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/ioctl_fslabel.2 b/man2/ioctl_fslabel.2
> index af17256f0..30435e1e9 100644
> --- a/man2/ioctl_fslabel.2
> +++ b/man2/ioctl_fslabel.2
> @@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
>  ioctl_fslabel \- get or set a filesystem label
>  .SH SYNOPSIS
>  .nf
> +.BR "#include <linux/fs.h>" "       /* Definition of " *FSLABEL* " constants */"
>  .B #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> -.B #include <linux/fs.h>
>  .PP
>  .BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", FS_IOC_GETFSLABEL, char " label [FSLABEL_MAX]);
>  .BI "int ioctl(int " fd ", FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL, char " label [FSLABEL_MAX]);
> 


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux