Re: [PATCH] scanf.3: clarify that %n supports type modifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Alyssa,

On 3/28/21 11:55 PM, Alyssa Ross wrote:
My initial reading of this was that type modifiers were probably not
supported.  But they are, and this is actually documented further up,
in the type modifiers documentation.  But to make it clearer, let's
copy the language that printf(3) has in its %n section.

Signed-off-by: Alyssa Ross <hi@xxxxxxxxx>

Patch applied.

Thanks,

Alex

---
I plan to submit a similar clarification to the glibc documentation.

  man3/scanf.3 | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/man3/scanf.3 b/man3/scanf.3
index f353f1d4d..8c0a1fa84 100644
--- a/man3/scanf.3
+++ b/man3/scanf.3
@@ -513,18 +513,20 @@ circumflex, in) set or when the field width runs out.
  .TP
  .B n
  Nothing is expected; instead, the number of characters consumed thus far
  from the input is stored through the next pointer, which must be a pointer
  to
-.IR int .
+.IR int ,
+or variant whose size matches the (optionally)
+supplied integer length modifier.
  This is
  .I not
  a conversion and does
  .I not
  increase the count returned by the function.
  The assignment can be suppressed with the
  .B *
  assignment-suppression character, but the effect on the
  return value is undefined.
  Therefore
  .B %*n
  conversions should not be used.



--
Alejandro Colomar
Linux man-pages comaintainer; https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux