Re: [PATCH 1/1] ip.7: Add "special and reserved addresses" section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Seth David Schoen:

> Both things you noted are true: you can change broadcast addresses with
> ifconfig or ip (e.g. ip addr add x/y broadcast z dev d), and /31 subnets
> indeed don't have them.  This is defined at

There is also the questions of netmask that aren't in the CIDR style
(so 255.255.0.255 instead of 255.255.255.0).  Are they still
supported?

> I'm not familiar with a way in which it depends on the network device
> other than the /31 issue.  At least, this particular logic isn't
> affected by other aspects of the network device type.

Are there network devices that are neither point-to-point, nor do they
have broadcast support?

> Could you suggest a way that these details could usefully be described
> here?  The ability to change the broadcast address is very little-used,
> so I'm not sure many readers would benefit from details about it here,
> but I also wouldn't want to mislead them about that.  Maybe just
> changing it to "are both designated, by default, as broadcast
> addresses"?

My main concern is that the language should not imply that something
cannot happen if it actually can.  Otherwise programmers will end up
using this guidance and create software that won't work in such
configurations.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux