Re: [PATCHv2 bpf-next 00/15] Improve BPF syscall command documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 9:20 AM Joe Stringer <joe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Rather than tackle everything at once, I have focused in this series on
> the syscall commands, "enum bpf_cmd".
...
> The eventual goal of this effort would be to extend the kernel UAPI
> headers such that each of the categories I had listed above (commands,
> maps, progs, hooks) have dedicated documentation in the kernel tree, and
> that developers must update the comments in the headers to document the
> APIs prior to patch acceptance, and that we could auto-generate the
> latest version of the bpf(2) manual pages based on a few static
> description sections combined with the dynamically-generated output from
> the header.
> v2:
> * Remove build infrastructure in favor of kernel-doc directives
> * Shift userspace-api docs under Documentation/userspace-api/ebpf
> * Fix scripts/bpf_doc.py syscall --header (throw unsupported error)
> * Improve .gitignore handling of newly autogenerated files

Looks great. Applied. Thanks!



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux