Re: [PATCH] posix.py: ffix: Correctly format URIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>, 2021-01-21, 20:54:
On 1/12/21 9:51 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
On 1/10/21 7:50 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
They use left and right angle bracket special character escapes (Unicode U+2039 and U+203A)

I think that's a bug in groff. It should use plain <> for URLs, at least
for tty output devices.

* Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>, 2021-01-10, 15:35:
I checked, and yes, it renders some character (the character depends on the terminal: on tty I've seen a diamond, and on the xfce terminal something similar (but slightly different) to a parenthesis).

Your console font doesn't support U+2039/U+203A and uses diamond as a replacement character.

I have this in /etc/groff/mdoc.local and /etc/groff/mdoc.local as a work-around:

.  if '\V[TERM]'linux' \
.    tr \[la]<
.  if '\V[TERM]'linux' \
.    tr \[ra]>

(In the long run, I should probably fix the font instead.)


After seeing Branden's answer to Michael (Escaping hyphens), I've seen groff_char(7), and I found that my tty correctly supports U+2039 and U+203A. I clearly see the symbols I would expect: something quite similar to plain <>, but a bit more obtuse.

In the XFCE terminal, I also see something quite expected: a slightly smaller version of <>.

But both show me very different characters for .UR/.UE.
tty displays a diamond, and XFCE term displays (a weird version of) round parentheses.

So... does it mean there's a bug in .UR/.UE?

Or a bug in Branden. ;-)

Contrary to what he wrote, and what I parroted, .UR/.UE use U+27E8 and U+27E9 as delimiters.

--
Jakub Wilk



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux