[redirecting to groff@xxxxxxx; Reply-To set] Hi Jakub! At 2021-01-12T21:51:15+0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > On 1/10/21 7:50 AM, G. Branden Robinson wrote: [regarding groff's an-ext.tmac's .UR/.UE macros] > > > They use left and right angle bracket special character escapes > > > (Unicode U+2039 and U+203A) > > I think that's a bug in groff. It should use plain <> for URLs, at > least for tty output devices. Even for TTY devices that can render angle brackets just fine? Can you say why? > * Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>, 2021-01-10, 15:35: > > I checked, and yes, it renders some character (the character depends > > on the terminal: on tty I've seen a diamond, and on the xfce > > terminal something similar (but slightly different) to a > > parenthesis). > > Your console font doesn't support U+2039/U+203A and uses diamond as a > replacement character. > > I have this in /etc/groff/mdoc.local and /etc/groff/mdoc.local as a > work-around: > > . if '\V[TERM]'linux' \ > . tr \[la]< > . if '\V[TERM]'linux' \ > . tr \[ra]> > > (In the long run, I should probably fix the font instead.) I think this may be another use case for the .soquiet and .msoquiet[1] requests I have proposed to support possibly-nonexistent or permission-blocked opens of files; in this case, something like $HOME/.troffrc or $XDG_DATA_HOME/troffrc. I don't share Jakub's preference but, with the right tools, I'd defend to the death his right to configure it. :D Thoughts? Regards, Branden [1] Or .sofailok or .msofailok or whatever we end up calling them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature