Re: [PATCH] keyctl.2: tfix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Michael,

On 12/1/20 8:48 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> On 12/1/20 3:40 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
>> From: Arusekk <arek_koz@xxxxx>
>>
>> Fixes: fa76da808eff
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arusekk <arek_koz@xxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Arusekk sent this patch twice. I applied the first version in my local tree,
> but this version of the patch has a better commit message, so I dropped the 
> old patch and applied this version instead.

Are you sure?
I only see one patch from him.
If you're seeing it on lore,
you're probably seeing it repeated because it
shows similar emails on the same thread even if unrelated
(which I agree, causes some unnecessary confusion).

The only patch I see from Arusekk is:
Message-Id: <20201201112245.11764-1-arek_koz@xxxxx>
which has this same commit msg, but without the signature, which I added.

BTW, thanks for reviewing the other thread!

Thanks,

Alex

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael
>> ---
>>  man2/keyctl.2 | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/man2/keyctl.2 b/man2/keyctl.2
>> index 8930fb78b..4fa54bc14 100644
>> --- a/man2/keyctl.2
>> +++ b/man2/keyctl.2
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ keyctl \- manipulate the kernel's key management facility
>>  .B #include <sys/types.h>
>>  .B #include <keyutils.h>
>>  .PP
>> -.BI "long keyctl(int " operation ", ...)"
>> +.BI "long keyctl(int " operation ", ...);"
>>  
>>  .B "/* For direct call via syscall(2): */"
>>  .B #include <asm/unistd.h>
>>
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux