Re: sigaction.2: clarification for SA_NODEFER needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:04:08PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Am 12. November 2020 22:01:58 MEZ schrieb "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> Is there a function to change the signal mask without leaving the
> >handler?
> >
> >sigprocmask(2).
> 
> You might want to add a link to the function in the note section.

Actually, this is best avoided IMHO:

The behaviour of sigprocmask() is unspecified in multithreaded programs,
while pthread_sigmask() is not specified to be safe in signal handlers.
(Yay, POSIX.)

For these reasons, execve()'ing directly from a signal handler is not a
great idea.  It would probably be better to escape from the signal
handler with siglongjmp() or setcontext(), with the target sigjmp_buf or
ucontext previously set up do the execve().

With SA_SIGINFO, you can also update uc->uc_sigmask inside the signal
handler if you want to change the signal mask on return.  But that's
awkward to do portably, since sigaddset() and sigdelset() are not
specified to be safe in signal handlers either.

Cheers
---Dave



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux