On 11/13/20 10:00 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: [...] > But in the "-branden" version I see > > [[ > .RS 6n > ]] > > If I understand correctly, then that number is calculated based on the > ".IP * 2" that precedes it. That doesn't seem good (since, maybe at > some point, one might want to change the .IP yo say ".IP 1) 3", > and then one has to fix the .RS lines. Am I missing something? Hi Branden, I agree with Michael: The number by which we indent the code should be 4 always, and the code needed for that should be independent of surrounding code. .RS 6 is 2 + 4 because you're adding the 2 of the .IP. I don't like it. I think there's no consistent solution using .RS. Thanks, Alex
