On 10/1/20 7:35 AM, Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha wrote:
+The narrowest signed integer type +of a width of at least N bits,
Motivation is missing here. Why is there an int_leastN_t type at all? Also, on all glibc platforms, int_leastN_t is equivalent to intN_t; this should probably be mentioned.
Similarly for int_fastN_t.
