On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 01:27:55PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > man7/system_data_types.7 | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7 > index 84fea85b9..041e7e243 100644 > --- a/man7/system_data_types.7 > +++ b/man7/system_data_types.7 The distinction might not be worth highlighting here, but types like size_t are a bit special in that they come from the C standards and assumptions about them are really built into the compiler. The system can define its own size_t, but it had better be equivalent to the compiler's definition otherwise bad things will happen... > @@ -92,6 +92,101 @@ See also: > .\".I siginfo_t > .\"type in this page. > .TP > +.I size_t > +.IP > +Include: > +.I <stddef.h> > +or Where does this arbitrary-looking list of headers come from? >From the C standards at least, <stddef.h> seems to be the canonical header for this type. > +.IR <sys/types.h> ; > +or > +.I <aio.h> > +or > +.I <glob.h> > +or > +.I <grp.h> > +or > +.I <iconv.h> > +or > +.I <monetary.h> > +or > +.I <mqueue.h> [...] Cheers ---Dave
