Hi Alex, On 9/27/20 11:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > man7/system_data_types.7 | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/man7/system_data_types.7 b/man7/system_data_types.7 > index ff0403df9..16930985e 100644 > --- a/man7/system_data_types.7 > +++ b/man7/system_data_types.7 > @@ -197,6 +197,29 @@ Conforming to: C99 and later; POSIX.1-2001 and later. > See also: > .BR fenv (3) > .RE > +.\"------------------------------------- FILE -------------------------/ > +.TP > +.I FILE > +.RS > +.br See my previous mail. In the meantime, I'm okay with applying this kind of formatting for this (and following) patches, though it may need changing later. > +Include: > +.IR <stdio.h> ; > +or > +.IR <wchar.h> . > +.PP > +An object type used for streams. > +.PP > +Conforming to: C99 and later; POSIX.1-2001 and later. > +.PP > +See also: > +.BR fclose (3), > +.BR flockfile (3), > +.BR fopen (3), > +.BR fread (3), > +.BR stdin (3), > +.BR stdio (3), > +.BR unlocked_stdio (3) Let's have fscanf() and fprintf() here. On the other hand, I think unlocked_stdio(3) probably isn't needed. > +.RE > .\"------------------------------------- float_t ----------------------/ > .TP > .I float_t Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
