Hello Florian, On 2020-09-18 16:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha: > >> +Used for a count of bytes. It is the result of the >> +.I sizeof >> +operator. >> +According to the C language standard, >> +it shall be an unsigned integer type >> +capable of storing values in the range [0, >> +.BR SIZE_MAX ]. > > Thanks for working on this. :-) > Maybe add that this commonly maps to unsigned int or unsigned long, and I thought the same in the beginning, but then Michael convinced me to not do it. On 2020-09-13 22:20, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>> Is it a 32-bit or 64-bit or may vary? Is it signed or unsigned? >>> POSIX doesn't specify, I think.> >>> One other thing the page should show of course is definition of the >>> structure types. >> Yes. >> >> >> timer_t <time.h> or <sys/types.h> >> POSIX timer ID. >> >> typedef void *timer_t; > Here I would *not* show these kinds of typedefs. The point is > that these types should be treated as being somewhat unknown > (e.g., for casts in printf()). Here, I think instead maybe we > just have a statement that POSIX makes no specific requirements > for the representation of this type. I think I prefer to leave it opaque, showing only the requirements that POSIX and C make. There's really not much gain (basically uint and ulong cover most of the possibilities; and still it's not a guarantee). And readers might write non-portable code because of reading that. On 2020-09-18 16:34, Florian Weimer wrote: > that the length modifier for printf and scanf is z, commently used as > %zu or %zx (%zd is for ssize_t). Good idea. Would you prefer that, or just refer to printf(3) in See also?. > > Florian > Thanks, Alex