Hi Alex, On 9/14/20 12:37 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hello Alex, > > On 9/14/20 2:20 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > I'm going to hold my finger in the wind, and say: lets restrict the > list to what seem like the most relevant APIs, where obviously that is > a somewhat subjective choice. You could include all the other APIs in > .\" comments, so we can see what's excluded, and this may trigger some > tweaking. So, for 'struct timespec' the list might be as simple as: > > clock_gettime(2), clock_nanosleep(2), nanosleep(2) > timerfd_gettime(2), timer_gettime(2) Just to add to this. Even if limiting to "relevant" APIs, I think some of the lists might still be quite long (which is okay). For example, I do expect the 'time_t' list will remain long. Some of your items in the 'timer_t' list definitely don't belong (timer_getoverrun, timer_delete). The 'sigval' list looks about right. I think the 'timeval' list could be trimmed back a bit. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
