I didn’t know _FILE_OFFSET_BITS also affects size of ino_t. Do you see any issues printing ino_t with %lld ? On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:38 AM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:24:23AM -0700, Konstantin Bukin wrote: > > On x86 the size of ino_t does not appear to be larger than long. > > It depends. For example, with glibc on all architectures ino_t is 64-bit > when the code is compiled using -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. > > > -- > ldv
