Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Larry Dwyer <larryd.kbd@xxxxxxxxx>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>, austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:32:22 +0200
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-man <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Josey <ajosey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Elliot Hughes <enh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com>
References: <CALxWeYrisuzEPVEHOQSFJ8G_=8-VTAOTNBquyszOZMid7YfT=Q@mail.gmail.com> <6425d636-7f48-3a73-ef0e-7bb5b991360c@gmail.com>
Reply-to: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

On 8/9/20 1:18 AM, Larry Dwyer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> How about the "control" side and the "terminal" side (of the paired 
> device files)?

Thanks for the suggestion. As far as I'm concerned, that would 
also be an option worth considering.

Thanks,

Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
  - From: Joshua M. Clulow

References:
- Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
  - From: Michael Kerrisk
- Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
  - From: Larry Dwyer

Prev by Date: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
Next by Date: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
Previous by thread: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
Next by thread: Re: Pseudoterminal terminology in POSIX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux