On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > > > > I always use my own copy of the repository where I apply my new > > > > patches to. > > > > > > Please don't. When I've rejected particular changes (as below), > > > for reasons that I already explained (several times), then basing > > > your patches on private repo that still has those changes will > > > just cause breakage and wasted time for me. Please base patches > > > off a pristine master. > > > > > I do not support bad, wrong decisions. > > > > I do not support misuse. > > > > Your "trouble" is a direct consequence of your decisions. > > > > I have already answered your "explanations". > > So, at first I was giving you the benefit of the doubt, presuming that > you were not deliberately sending me patches that might break because > they included dependencies on changes that I had explicitly rejected > (several times) in the past. You've now made it clear that it was > deliberate. > > A few of your patches have helpful clean-ups, but the bother of > dealing with such nonsense[1] just isn't worth it. Please don't waste > time by sending me any further patches; they will be ignored. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-man&m=154743115806201&w=2 I do not propagate (pass on) wrongdoings, obstruction of truth, lies, mistakes, when I am aware of them. What does your "job" description say about resolving merge conflicts? Where is your "job" description available? ### "For what one has forbidden so far as a matter of principle has always been --- truth alone.". These words are valid for the history of humankind as well as for Nietzsche's family. Alice Miller "The Untouched key". Virago Press 1990, Page 122. Original title: "Der gemiedene Schlüssel". 1988.
