Re: [RFC PATCH] Replacing "master-slave" terminology for pseudoterminals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <libc-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-man <linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, enh <enh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Zack Weinberg <zackw@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Replacing "master-slave" terminology for pseudoterminals
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:47:30 +0200
Cc: mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@xxxxxxxxxx>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul Eggert <eggert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux API <linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <b3b4cf95-5eaa-0b4e-34cc-1a855e7148b6@gmail.com>
References: <b3b4cf95-5eaa-0b4e-34cc-1a855e7148b6@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

> Eventually, I think we should take this discussion also to the 
> mailing list,

That should have read: "the linux-kernel@ mailing list".

References:
- [RFC PATCH] Replacing "master-slave" terminology for pseudoterminals
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Prev by Date: Re: queue.3: Document CIRCLEQ_ macros
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH] Replacing "master-slave" terminology for pseudoterminals
Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] Replacing "master-slave" terminology for pseudoterminals
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]

Powered by Linux