Re: POSIX writer locks can't be recursive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Carlos,

Ping!

Thanks,

Michael

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 10:54, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Could you comment here, as this was your text in pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np(3)?
>
> On 6/25/20 2:32 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In pthread_rwlockattr_setkind_np(3), the explanation for
> > PTHREAD_RWLOCK_PREFER_WRITER_NP reads:
> >
> >> This is ignored by glibc because the POSIX requirement to support
> >> recursive writer locks would cause this option to create trivial
> >> deadlocks;
> >
> > I think this should be "reader locks" instead, since it is
> > undefined[1] for a thread holding a write lock to call
> > pthread_rwlock_wrlock(3) again (glibc returns EDEADLK, musl simply
> > deadlocks). There's no such requirement in POSIX either. Please let me
> > know if I'm missing something.
> >
> > [1]: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/pthread_rwlock_wrlock.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
> --
> Michael Kerrisk
> Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
> Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux