>>> On second thought now I am not so sure about the way how this un-listing >>> of /usr/X11R6 is mentioned in the patch. >>> >>> At the moment it is 'obsolete since FHS 3.0', we could write 'dropped >>> since FHS 3.0' or 'not mentioned in FHS 3.0 anymore' instead. >>> >>> What do you think about such rephrasing? Or should it be just deleted >>> from the manual page? How have been such updates (where something in >>> documentation is silently not mentioned anymore) handled in the past? >> >> I think it would be sufficient to say something like "present in FHS >> 2.3, removed in FHS 3.0". >> Shall I make that change, or do you want to revise youe patch? > > > That is a good idea. > > Being new to the process I would like to revise, make the change and > update the patch. Okay. -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
