Re: [PATCH 2/2] syscall.2: arm64: Fix syscall number register size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:24:40PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> arm64 is currently documented as receiving the syscall number in
> x8.
> 
> While this is the correct register, the syscall number is a 32-bit
> integer.  Bits [63:32] are ignored by the kernel.
> 
> So it is more correct to say "w8".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  man2/syscall.2 | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man2/syscall.2 b/man2/syscall.2
> index 53ab40e..d724651 100644
> --- a/man2/syscall.2
> +++ b/man2/syscall.2
> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ alpha	callsys	v0	v0	a4	a3	1, 6
>  arc	trap0	r8	r0	-	-
>  arm/OABI	swi NR	-	r0	-	-	2
>  arm/EABI	swi 0x0	r7	r0	r1	-
> -arm64	svc #0	x8	x0	x1	-
> +arm64	svc #0	w8	x0	x1	-

Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>

Will



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux