Hello, > On 20. Apr 2020, at 21.25, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello Kai, > > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 17:59, "Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus)" > <kai.makisara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 20. Apr 2020, at 12.48, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> [CC += Kai] >>> >>> On 4/19/20 8:48 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: >>>> Dear manpages maintainers. >>>> >> ... >>>> ** >>>> >>>> media → data >>>> >>>> msgid "Go to the end of the recorded media (for appending files)." >>>> >> End of media is the end of the tape. End of recorded media means >> after the last record/filemark that has been written to the tape. Usually >> (not always) you can write more data after what has been written >> so far. End of recorded media is standard tape terminology. >> >>>> -- >>>> drive → media >>>> >>>> "B<GMT_WR_PROT>(I<x>): The drive is write-protected. For some drives this " >>>> "can also mean that the drive does not support writing on the current medium " >>>> "type." >>> >> This basically means that the drive refuses to write to the media. It can be >> write-protected by the user. The additional text hints at the possibility >> that the drive can only read the media type in the drive. It is quite >> common that drives can read, for instance, several old formats >> (usually with smaller capacity) but can write only the newest types. >> Many times the user may not know very well the properties of the >> drive and wonders, why can’t I write even if the tape can be read >> and the write protect tab is off. > > So, if I understand right, then no changes to the wording are required? > I don’t think changes are necessarily needed. I don’t find any errors here. But when the text is not clear to readers, I always ask myself, should it be made clearer. I have understood that the man pages must be precise, but not too long. The requirements are different for the different sections of man pages. For instance, section 1 is meant for “ordinary” users but section 4 is for low-level interface to device drivers. I think we can assume that the users of section 4 have some technical knowledge about the device they are interested in programming. So, I don’t think changes are necessary. But I don’t object if someone wants to enhance the descriptions as long as they are precise and not too long. Thanks, Kai