Re: Errors in man pages, here: random.4.po: Wording

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/20 8:48 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Dear manpages maintainers.
> the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of
> man pages both from a large variety of sources (including manpages) as
> well for a large variety of target languages.
> 
> During their work translators notice different possible issues in the
> original (english) man pages. Sometiems this is a straightforward
> typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention
> not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original.
> 
> We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at
> least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some
> distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss
> the latest upstream version once a while, so the error might be
> already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately
> if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and
> the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check
> each and every issue.
> 
> Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format,
> i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man,
> groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where
> possible), but only an approximation which you need to translate into
> your source format.
> 
> Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are
> not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the
> problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify
> them.
> 
> I'm now reporting the errors for your project. As requested, each
> issue is sent in an unique mail for easier tracking on your side. If
> future reports should use another channel, please let me know.
> 
> **
> 
> The first sentence is very hard to read and should be reworded, maybe
> into two sentences.
> 
> "If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all major Linux "
> "distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the output is "
> "cryptographically secure against attackers without local root access as soon "
> "as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and perfectly adequate for network "
> "encryption session keys.  Since reads from I</dev/random> may block, users "
> "will usually want to open it in nonblocking mode (or perform a read with "
> "timeout), and provide some sort of user notification if the desired entropy "
> "is not immediately available."

Changed as per patch below.

Thanks,

Michael

diff --git a/man4/random.4 b/man4/random.4
index 5f0d52472..95fee6ed0 100644
--- a/man4/random.4
+++ b/man4/random.4
@@ -136,11 +136,13 @@ these applications,
 must be used instead,
 because it will block until the entropy pool is initialized.
 .PP
-If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below (all major
-Linux distributions have done this since 2000 at least), the output is
+If a seed file is saved across reboots as recommended below,
+the output is
 cryptographically secure against attackers without local root access as
 soon as it is reloaded in the boot sequence, and perfectly adequate for
 network encryption session keys.
+(All major Linux distributions have saved the seed file across reboots
+since 2000 at least.)
 Since reads from
 .I /dev/random
 may block, users will usually want to open it in nonblocking mode


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux