Re: Errors in man pages, here: strftime(3): Typo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/19/20 8:48 AM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Dear manpages maintainers.
> the manpage-l10n project maintains a large number of translations of
> man pages both from a large variety of sources (including manpages) as
> well for a large variety of target languages.
> 
> During their work translators notice different possible issues in the
> original (english) man pages. Sometiems this is a straightforward
> typo, sometimes a hard to read sentence, sometimes this is a convention
> not held up and sometimes we simply do not understand the original.
> 
> We use several distributions as sources and update regularly (at
> least every 2 month). This means we are fairly recent (some
> distributions like archlinux also update frequently) but might miss
> the latest upstream version once a while, so the error might be
> already fixed. We apologize and ask you to close the issue immediately
> if this should be the case, but given the huge volume of projects and
> the very limited number of volunteers we are not able to double check
> each and every issue.
> 
> Secondly we translators see the manpages in the neutral po format,
> i.e. converted and harmonized, but not the original source (be it man,
> groff, xml or other). So we cannot provide a true patch (where
> possible), but only an approximation which you need to translate into
> your source format.
> 
> Finally the issues I'm reporting have accumulated over time and are
> not always discovered by me, so sometimes my description of the
> problem my be a bit limited - do not hesitate to ask so we can clarify
> them.
> 
> I'm now reporting the errors for your project. As requested, each
> issue is sent in an unique mail for easier tracking on your side. If
> future reports should use another channel, please let me know.
> 
> **
> 
> three of -> three or
> 
> "B<%G>, B<%g>, and B<%V> yield values calculated from the week-based year "
> "defined by the ISO\\ 8601 standard.  In this system, weeks start on a "
> "Monday, and are numbered from 01, for the first week, up to 52 or 53, for "
> "the last week.  Week 1 is the first week where four or more days fall within "
> "the new year (or, synonymously, week 01 is: the first week of the year that "
> "contains a Thursday; or, the week that has 4 January in it).  When three of "
> "fewer days of the first calendar week of the new year fall within that year, "
> "then the ISO 8601 week-based system counts those days as part of week 53 of "
> "the preceding year.  For example, 1 January 2010 is a Friday, meaning that "
> "just three days of that calendar week fall in 2010.  Thus, the ISO\\ 8601 "
> "week-based system considers these days to be part of week 53 (B<%V>)  of the "
> "year 2009 (B<%G>); week 01 of ISO\\ 8601 year 2010 starts on Monday, 4 "
> "January 2010."

Fixed.

Thanks,

Michael


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux