Re: [PATCH 05/18] Add io_uring IO interface

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> hat am 29. Januar 2019 um 04:46 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> On 1/28/19 7:21 PM, Jann Horn wrote:
> > Please create a local copy of the request before parsing it to keep
> > the data from changing under you. Additionally, it might make sense to
> > annotate every pointer to shared memory with a comment, or something
> > like that, to ensure that anyone looking at the code can immediately
> > see for which pointers special caution is required on access.
> 
> I took a look at the viability of NOT having to local copy the data, and
> I don't think it's too bad. Local copy has a noticeable impact on the
> performance, hence I'd really (REALLY) like to avoid it.
> 
> Here's something on top of the current git branch. I think I even went a
> bit too far in some areas, but it should hopefully catch the cases where
> we might end up double evaluating the parts of the sqe that we depend
> on. For most of the sqe reading we don't really care too much. For
> instance, the sqe->user_data. If the app changes this field, then it
> just gets whatever passed back in cqe->user_data. That's not a kernel
> issue.
> 
> For cases like addr/len etc validation, it should be sound. I'll double
> check this in the morning as well, and obviously would need to be folded
> in along the way.
> 
> I'd appreciate your opinion on this part, if you see any major issues
> with it, or if I missed something.
> 
> 

thx for your important work, but please remove linux-man from the CC
the list is not the right place to post this kind of patches.


thx,
 wh



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux