Hello Johnny,
On 11/9/18 12:50 PM, Jonny Grant wrote:
> Hello Michael
>
> I'm proposing a change below to two man pages.
>
> execl(3) has NULL listed in that SYNOPSIS, so it would be consistent as
> if system(3) was also NULL in this example below.
>
>
> DESCRIPTION
> The system() library function uses fork(2) to create a child process
> that executes the shell command specified in command using execl(3) as
> follows:
>
> execl("/bin/sh", "sh", "-c", command, (char *) 0);
>
> ^ This should be NULL in example as per EXEC(3)?
Yes, I agree it would be more consistent. I made that change.
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
