Hi Michael, thank you foer the fast reply! On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 01:14:19PM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > It's pretty clear that there are some missing EINVAL cases > in the manual page. However, I think the case should rather > be documented as > > (tv.tv_set < 0 || tv.tv_usec < 0 || tv.tv_usec >= 1000000) > > giving EINVAL. But, perhaps I miss your point. What values > were you specifying to settimeofday() that led to EINVAL? I agree that the obvious case does not need to be docu- mented. But the problem was that we were (accidentally) trying to set the system time to e.g. 37 seconds after the epoch (i.e. tv.tv_sec = 37 and tv.tv_nsec = 0) when the system already had been up for several minutes. We were puzzled to get a failure from settimeofday() before realizing that you obviously can't set the system ime to anything nearer to the epoch than the current value of the uptime. Which makes a certain amount of sense as otherwise 'uptime -s' would have to report a time be- fore the start of the epoch. But, obviously, my attempt at describing the case in the patch wasn't very clear, so I probably better give it another try;-) I guess (but haven't tried yet) that the same will be the case for clock_settime(). Best regards, Jens -- \ Jens Thoms Toerring ________ jt@xxxxxxxxxxx \_______________________________ http://toerring.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html