On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The generic distros have been shipping this policy for the past 5 years.
.. so apparently it doesn't actually break things? Why not enable it
by default then?
And if "turn off secure boot" really is the accepted - and actuially
used - workaround for the breakage, then
WHY THE HELL DIDN'T YOU START OFF BY EXPLAINING THAT IN THE FIRST
PLACE WHEN PEOPLE ASKED WHY THE TIE-IN EXISTED?
Sorry for shouting, but really. We have a thread of just *how* many
email messages that asked for the explanation for this? All we got was
incomprehensible and illogical crap explanations.
If there actually was a good explanation for the tie-in, it should
have been front-and-center and explained as such.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
