Hello Jann, On 02/08/2018 11:46 PM, Jann Horn wrote: > The "RETURN VALUE" section made a claim that was incorrect for > PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER. Explicitly describe the behavior of > PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER in the "RETURN VALUE" section (as usual), but > leave the now duplicate description in the section describing > PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER, since the PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER section > would otherwise probably become harder to understand. Thanks! Patch applied. Cheers, Michael > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > man2/ptrace.2 | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man2/ptrace.2 b/man2/ptrace.2 > index e1c3eec46..d78b8db2d 100644 > --- a/man2/ptrace.2 > +++ b/man2/ptrace.2 > @@ -2206,7 +2206,10 @@ the report is sent only once. > On success, the > .B PTRACE_PEEK* > requests return the requested data (but see NOTES), > -while other requests return zero. > +the > +.B PTRACE_SECCOMP_GET_FILTER > +request returns the number of instructions in the BPF program, and > +other requests return zero. > .PP > On error, all requests return \-1, and > .I errno > -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
