On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Serge E. Hallyn <serge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Update the capabilities(7) manpage with a description of the
> new-ish namespaced file capability support.
>
> A note on userspace tools: since the kernel will automatically
> convert between v2 and v3 xattrs, and translate nsroot between
> v3 xattrs, we can make do with the current getcap(8) and setcap(8)
> tools. I.e. a user on the host can create a transient user namespace
> with the appropriate mappings and run setcap(8) there. The kernel
> will automatically write a v3 xattr with the transient namespace's
> root user as nsroot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <shallyn@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> man7/capabilities.7 | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/man7/capabilities.7 b/man7/capabilities.7
> index 166eaaf..76e7e02 100644
> --- a/man7/capabilities.7
> +++ b/man7/capabilities.7
> @@ -936,6 +936,50 @@ if we specify the effective flag as being enabled for any capability,
> then the effective flag must also be specified as enabled
> for all other capabilities for which the corresponding permitted or
> inheritable flags is enabled.
> +.PP
> +Until 4.13, only VFS_CAP_REVISION_2 xattrs were supported. These store only
> +the capabilities to be applied to the file, with no record of the writer's
> +credentials. Therefore only privileged users can be trusted to write them, and
> +.BR CAP_SETFCAP
> +over the user namespace which mounted the filesystem (usually the initial user
> +namespace) is required. This makes it impossible to write file capabilities
> +from a user namespaced container, which causes some package updates to fail.
> +.PP
> +In order to support setting file capabilities in containers, the
> +kernel must be able to identify whether the task executing the
> +file will be constrained to a subset of the resources over which
> +the writer of the file capabilities has privilege. To this end,
> +since 4.13, VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 capabilities store the user ID
> +of the root user in the writer's namespace ("nsroot"). Hence the writer only
> +requires
> +.IP 1.
> +.BR CAP_SETFCAP
> +over the file inode, meaning the writing task must have
> +.BR CAP_SETFCAP
> +over a user namespace into which the inode's owning user ID is mapped.
> +.PP
> +and
> +.IP 2.
> +.BR CAP_SETFCAP
> +over the writer's own user namespace.
I think that the following would be clearer (but technically
equivalent): "Hence the writer only requires CAP_SETFCAP over the file
inode, meaning that the writing task must have CAP_SETFCAP in its own
user namespace and the UID and GID of the file inode must be mapped in
the writing task's user namespace.".
> +A VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 file capability will take effect only when run in a user namespace
> +whose UID 0 maps to the saved "nsroot", or a descendant of such a namespace.
> +.PP
> +Users with the required privilege may use
> +.BR setxattr(2)
> +to request either a VFS_CAP_REVISION_2 or VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 write.
> +The kernel will automatically convert a VFS_CAP_REVISION_2 to a
> +VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 extended attribute with the "nsroot"
> +set to the root user in the writer's user namespace, or, if a VFS_CAP_REVISION_3
> +extended attribute is specified, then the kernel will map the
> +specified root user ID (which must be a valid user ID mapped in the caller's
> +user namespace) into the initial user namespace.
Really, "into the initial user namespace"? That may be true for the
kernel-internal representation, but the on-disk representation is the
mapping into the user namespace that contains the mount namespace into
which the file system was mounted, right? This would become observable
when a file system is mounted in a different namespace than before, or
when working with FUSE in a namespace.
> Likewise,
> +.BR getxattr(2)
> +results will be converted and simplified to show a VFS_CAP_REVISION_2
> +extended attribute, if a VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 applies to the caller's
> +namespace, or to map the VFS_CAP_REVISION_3 root user ID into the
> +caller's namespace.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
