Hello, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:18:48PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Ahh yes. Now I understand. I made the description of the containment > rules for cgroup.threads more explicit in the text: > > As with writing to cgroup.procs, some containment rules apply when > writing to the cgroup.threads file: > > * The writer must have write permission on the cgroup.threads > file in the destination cgroup. > > * The writer must have write permission on the cgroup.procs file > in the common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups. > (In some cases, the common ancestor may be the source or desti‐ > nation cgroup itself.) > > * The source and destination cgroups must be in the same threaded > subtree. (Outside a threaded subtree, an attempt to move a > thread by writing its thread ID to the cgroup.threads in a dif‐ > ferent domain cgroup fails with the error EOPNOTSUPP.) > > Okay? (I realize that the last bullet point is a rather different way of > formulating your idea that "the only extra restriction is that the domain > cgroup must be the same for the source and destination". But I think the > reformulation is easier to understand, no?) It looks great to me. Me explaining that way is mostly from internal / conceptual POV. Yours is definitely more approachable. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
