Hello, Michael. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >>>> Can you please confirm that it's only necessary to delegate this file > >>>> if we are delegating a threaded subtree? > >>> > >>> Replied on the other thread. The file isn't delegatable as far as I > >>> can tell. > >> > >> So, following on from the discussion in the other thread, my > >> question above still stands. > > > > Oh, I frankly haven't thought about delegating a threaded subtree. > > I'm still confused. cgroup-v2.txt documents the possibility. You > wrote that text. We just had a conversation in another thread about the > fact that cgroup.threads is delegatable. You must have thought at > least a little about this? Oh, I'm probably mixing up two things. 1. When delegating, cgroup.threads should be delegated. Doing that selectively doesn't achieve anything meaningful. 2. I haven't thought much about delegating a sub-protion of a threaded subtree. Everything works the same way. I just can't think of a use case. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
