Re: [PATCH] recvmmsg.2, sendmmsg.2: point out that error handling is unreliable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 00:39 +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> I am not sure that I understand that last sentence. Do you mean something
> like:
> 
>     The caller can retry the transmission, starting at first failed message,
>     but there is no guarantee that, if an error is returned, it will be the
>     same error as the one that was lost on the previous call.
> 
> ?
> 

Hello Michael,

yes, that's exactly what I meant. I'll update and re-send the patch.

Thanks,
Nikola
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux