[PATCH RFC] stat.2: Document that stat can fail with EINTR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Particularly on network file systems, a stat call may require
submitting a message over the network and waiting interruptably
for a reply.

Signed-off-by: Keno Fischer <keno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

The catalyst for this patch was me experiencing EINTR errors when
using the 9p file system. In linux commit 9523feac, the 9p file
system was changed to use wait_event_killable instead of
wait_event_interruptible, which does indeed address my problem,
but also makes me a bit unhappy, because uninterruptable waits
prevents things like ^C'ing the execution and some debugging
tools which depend on being able to cancel long-running operations
by sending signals. I'd like to ask the user space applications I
care about to properly handle such situations (either by using
SA_RESTART or by explicitly handling EINTR), but it's a bit of a
hard sell if EINTR isn't documented to be a possibility. I'm hoping
this doc PATCH will generate a discussion of whether EINTR is an
appropriate thing for stat (as a stand in for a file system call that's
not read/write) to return. If so, I'd be happy to submit
patches to other file system-related syscalls along these same lines.

I realize I'm probably 20 years too late here, but it feels like
clarificaion on what to expect from the kernel would still go a long
way here.  

 man2/stat.2 | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/man2/stat.2 b/man2/stat.2
index dad9a01..f10235a 100644
--- a/man2/stat.2
+++ b/man2/stat.2
@@ -452,6 +452,11 @@ Invalid flag specified in
 is relative and
 .I dirfd
 is a file descriptor referring to a file other than a directory.
+.TP
+.B EINTR
+The call was interrupted by delivery of a signal caught by a handler; see
+.BR signal (7).
+The possibility of this error is file-system dependent.
 .SH VERSIONS
 .BR fstatat ()
 was added to Linux in kernel 2.6.16;
-- 
2.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux