Re: [patch v2] madvise.2: Add MADV_WIPEONFORK documentation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rik,

Thanks for the blazingly fast response :-)

On 9 October 2017 at 21:08, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 21:06 +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Rik,
>>
>> I have a follow-up question re wipe-on-fork. What are the semantics
>> for this setting with respect to fork() and exec()? That is, in the
>> child of a fork(), does the flag remain set for the specified address
>> range? (My quick read of the source suggests yes, but I have not
>> tested.) And, when we do an exec(), my assumption is that the flag is
>> cleared for the address range, but it would be good to have
>> confirmation.
>
> Indeed, on exec() the flag is cleared, because all
> memory regions get replaced on exec().

Thanks.

> The flag remains across a fork(), so if a child task
> were to fork, the memory would be empty of contents
> again in its child. This seems to most closely match
> the use case of discarding things like cryptographic
> secrets at fork time.

Thanks!

I'll add this info to the madvise(2) page.

Cheers,

Michael



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux